11 DRTs Have No Presiding Officers': Supreme Court Seeks Union's Response On PIL To Fill Up Vacancies

The Supreme Court sought the Union government’s response on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) regarding the lack of presiding officers in 11 Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs). The PIL highlighted the vacancies and the resulting delays in the adjudication of cases. The court emphasized the need for timely appointments to ensure the efficient functioning of DRTs and the speedy resolution of debt recovery cases. This decision underscores the importance of addressing judicial vacancies to maintain the effectiveness of the legal system.