Bail Condition That Accused Shall Furnish Bail Bonds 6 Months After Passing Of Order Can't Be Imposed : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that a bail condition requiring the accused to furnish bail bonds six months after the order’s passing is impermissible. The court held that such a condition violates the fundamental principles of bail, which aim to ensure the accused’s presence during the trial without imposing unreasonable restrictions. The case involved an accused who challenged the bail condition, arguing that it was arbitrary and unjust. The Supreme Court emphasized that bail conditions should be reasonable and not infringe on the accused’s rights. The decision reinforces the need for fair and just bail conditions that align with the principles of justice and liberty.