Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
CENVAT Credit availed instead of Refund and Utilised for Paying Excise Duty: CESTAT sets aside Recovery Order
In a recent case, the CESTAT set aside a recovery order where CENVAT credit, mistakenly availed instead of a refund, was utilized to pay excise duty. The appellant argued that the credit was erroneously availed due to confusion over refund eligibility. CESTAT accepted the explanation, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intent. The decision highlights the importance of clarity in tax credit utilization and the potential for procedural errors in complex tax frameworks.