Composite Reference May Be Made When Two Contracts Are So Intertwined That Separate Arbitral Proceedings Would Prejudice Parties: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court ruled that a composite reference to an arbitrator is valid when two contracts are so intertwined that separate arbitration would prejudice the parties. The case involved two contracts between the same parties, with disputes arising under both. The court found that the contracts were closely related and that a single arbitration would be more efficient and fair. The ruling emphasizes the importance of considering the relationship between contracts in arbitration proceedings to ensure just and efficient dispute resolution.