Court In Exercise Of Supervisory Jurisdiction Shall Not Interfere With Arbitral Award, Limited Scope Of Interference: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court held that judicial interference in arbitral awards is limited and should not interfere unless there is a clear jurisdictional or procedural flaw. The case involved a challenge to an arbitral award, and the Court emphasized that its role in supervising arbitral proceedings is limited. The Court ruled that it cannot interfere with the arbitral award unless there is a clear error or violation of procedural fairness, reinforcing the principle of minimal judicial interference in arbitration matters.