Court U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence And Substitute Arbitrator's Conclusion: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court ruled that courts cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute their own conclusions for those of an arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The court emphasized that judicial intervention in arbitration awards should be limited to grounds specified in the Act, such as procedural irregularities or violations of public policy. This decision reinforces the principle of minimal judicial interference in arbitration proceedings to uphold the finality and efficiency of arbitral awards.