Court Which Appointed Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction To Substitute Arbitrator Or Extend Time U/S 29 Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court ruled that Section 29A of the Arbitration Act vests jurisdiction in the High Court for domestic arbitration cases, including substituting arbitrators or extending timelines. The case involved a dispute over the authority to make such decisions, with conflicting interpretations of “court” under the Act. The court clarified that jurisdiction lies with the High Court in domestic arbitrations and the court appointing the arbitrator. Legal experts interpret this decision as resolving ambiguities in arbitration law and reinforcing the role of the judiciary in facilitating efficient dispute resolution. The ruling ensures consistency in arbitration proceedings and emphasizes the need for clarity in interpreting statutory provisions. It also underscores the judiciary’s supportive role in arbitration, ensuring that procedural hurdles do not impede the resolution of disputes.