Delhi High Court Allows Extension Of Arbitrator's Mandate Despite Post-Expiry Filing U/S 29A Of Arbitration Act

The Delhi High Court allowed the extension of an arbitrator’s mandate despite the filing of an application under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act after the expiry of the mandate. The case involved a dispute where the arbitrator’s mandate had expired, and an application for extension was filed post-expiry. The court held that the mandate could be extended to ensure the completion of the arbitration process and avoid unnecessary delays. The court emphasized the importance of facilitating the arbitration process and ensuring that procedural technicalities do not hinder the resolution of disputes. This decision highlights the court’s supportive role in arbitration proceedings.