Delhi High Court Orders Implementation Of 'Avlamban Fund Scheme' With ₹10 Crore Corpus To Compensate Acid Attack Victims

The Telangana High Court ruled that writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are not maintainable in cases of contractual disputes. The Court emphasized that such disputes should be settled through appropriate legal remedies and forums, rather than through writ petitions. The judgment clarified that judicial review under Article 226 is not meant for adjudicating contractual matters, which fall under the purview of civil courts. The ruling serves to reinforce the separation of powers and the appropriate judicial forums for resolving specific types of disputes, particularly those related to contractual obligations.