Don't Dig Up Ghosts, Be Sensitive About Judiciary': Supreme Court In PIL Against Ex-Andhra CM Jagan Over Remarks On Justice Ramana

The Supreme Court observed that remarks by Andhra Pradesh CM Jagan Mohan Reddy against Justice NV Ramana demanded greater sensitivity toward the judiciary. The remarks were made in an alleged letter to the Chief Justice, raising allegations against Justice Ramana’s impartiality. The court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation seeking action against the CM, stating that public figures must avoid undermining judicial credibility. The bench emphasized that maintaining public confidence in the judiciary is essential for democracy. While dismissing the PIL, the court urged politicians and citizens alike to exercise restraint and show respect for judicial institutions. This ruling reiterates the judiciary’s commitment to preserving its independence while discouraging unwarranted public criticism. It signals the importance of respecting institutional decorum and maintaining trust in judicial processes, even during political conflicts or controversies.