Evaluation Of Alternative Propositions By Arbitrator For Interim Award Does Not Constitute Inherent Contradiction Or Perversity: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court ruled that an arbitrator considering alternative propositions while passing an interim award does not amount to inherent contradiction or perversity. The judgment affirmed the arbitrator's discretion in evaluating different legal positions and framing interim relief. This decision supports the flexibility of arbitrators in addressing complex disputes during ongoing proceedings.