Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Ex-Parte Order Appointing Commissioner To Conduct Search/Seizure In IPR Infringement Cases Is To Preserve Evidence, Necessary: Karnataka HC
The Karnataka High Court dealt with the appointment of a Court Commissioner in cases involving intellectual property rights (IPR). The court ruled that the role of a Court Commissioner is crucial for the proper administration of justice in IPR disputes. The appointment of a Court Commissioner was deemed necessary to ensure that the intricacies of such cases are handled with expertise and neutrality. The judgment stressed the importance of having professionals assist the court in cases where technical knowledge of IPR is required. This decision aims to streamline the process and improve efficiency in handling IPR-related cases.