Harsh, Unwarranted' : Justices Nagarathna & Dhulia Object To CJI Chandrachud's Remarks On Justice Krishna Iyer Doctrine

The CESTAT ruled that no customs duty demand can be made on materials intended for manufacturing when destroyed by a fire accident. The case involved a taxpayer who imported raw materials for manufacturing purposes, which were subsequently destroyed in a fire accident. The customs authorities demanded duty on the destroyed materials, arguing that they were not used for manufacturing. The taxpayer argued that the materials were intended for manufacturing and the destruction was accidental. The CESTAT agreed with the taxpayer, ruling that no duty demand could be made on materials destroyed by an accident. This decision underscores the importance of considering the intent and circumstances in customs duty assessments and highlights the need for fair treatment of taxpayers in cases of accidental loss.