In Specific Performance Suit, Separate Relief For Possession Not Required When Transfer Of Possession Is Implicit In Agreement To Sell : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that in specific performance suits, separate relief for possession is not required when transfer of possession is implicit in the agreement to sell. In this case, the Court considered whether a buyer is entitled to both specific performance and possession separately when the agreement already implied possession transfer. The ruling clarified that if possession is part of the agreement, no separate remedy for possession is needed. This judgment aims to streamline civil cases involving property disputes, ensuring clarity in the enforcement of sale agreements.