Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Kerala High Court Lifts Restriction on Prisoner’s Leave Condition Preventing Entry to Hometown.
Update / Judgement Date
30 Oct 2025
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Sakshi Bhardwaj — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
3 min read

The Kerala High Court modified a condition imposed on a convict’s ordinary leave, which prohibited him from entering the jurisdictional limits of Ottapalam Police Station — his native place. The Court held that the restriction defeated the purpose of granting leave, especially when no valid reasons were cited for imposing such a stringent condition. Accordingly, the condition was lifted, allowing the petitioner to visit his home while ensuring safeguards to prevent any misuse of liberty.
• The petitioner, Sarath K.C, aged 31, is Accused No. 3 in S.C. No. 698/2019 before the Additional Sessions Court, Ottapalam, and is currently serving life imprisonment as Convict No. C-204/2023 at the Central Prison and Correctional Home, Thavanoor.
• He was granted ordinary leave under an order dated 24.10.2025 (Exhibit P1), which included a condition that he shall not enter the jurisdictional limits of the Ottapalam Police Station or contact any residents within those limits.
• The petitioner challenged this condition, contending that his residence is within Ottapalam Police Station limits, and such a restriction rendered the leave meaningless.
• It was further submitted that no reasons were provided by the prison authorities for imposing such an onerous condition.
• The Court noted that the petitioner’s residence is within Ottapalam Police Station jurisdiction and, therefore, prohibiting entry into his own locality would frustrate the purpose of granting leave.
• It found that the impugned condition in Exhibit P1 was imposed without justification or specific reasoning by the authorities.
• Justice Kauser Edappagath observed that the objective of granting ordinary leave is rehabilitation and family reintegration, which cannot be achieved if the prisoner is barred from visiting his home.
• The Court also referred to a previous judgment (Exhibit P2, W.P.(Crl.) No. 1390/2025, dated 22.10.2025) where similar relief was granted to a co-accused.
• While lifting the restriction, the Court imposed a safeguard requiring the petitioner to report weekly to the local police station and avoid contact with the relatives of the deceased.
The Court lifted the condition in Exhibit P1 prohibiting the petitioner from entering Ottapalam Police Station limits. The petitioner was directed to:
- Report before the Station House Officer, Ottapalam Police Station, every Monday at 10:00 a.m.
- Refrain from contacting the relatives of the deceased residing within the Ottapalam Police Station limits.
- The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
• Prisons Act, 1894 – Regulation of prison administration and prisoner leave.
• Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Rules, 2021 – Rules governing prisoner leave and parole.
• Article 226, Constitution of India – Power of the High Court to issue writs for enforcement of rights.
Citation: 2025:KER:81560
Case: Sarath K.C v. State of Kerala & Ors.
Court: High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam
Coram: Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath
Date of Decision: 30 October 2025
Writ Petition (Crl.) No.: 1470 of 2025