Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Madras HC Strikes Down GST Time Extensions Notification u/s 168A: What It Means for Pending Adjudications
In a landmark decision with far-reaching consequences, the Madras High Court has struck down notifications issued by the government that had extended the timelines for passing GST orders under Section 168A of the CGST Act. The government had used its powers under this section, which allows for extensions during force majeure events like the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the High Court held that these powers cannot be used to grant repeated, blanket extensions for issuing adjudication orders beyond the original statutory deadlines. The court found that such extensions were not justified and went beyond the scope of the section. This ruling renders many pending adjudication proceedings, which relied on these extended deadlines, potentially invalid. It is expected to lead to a significant number of GST demand orders being quashed for being time-barred, providing major relief to taxpayers across the country.