Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
No Evidence Of Wilful Misstatement In SCN To Invoke Extended Limitation: CESTAT Set Aside Rs 4.84 Lakh Duty Demand
This piece reports how CESTAT held that invoking the extended period of limitation under service tax provisions requires positive proof of fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement or intent to evade; in the absence of such findings the Tribunal set aside a ~Rs 4.84 lakh demand. The article highlights the legal principle that mere default or delay does not justify extended period invocation.