Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Notice U/S 138 NI Act Valid If Sent To Last Known Address Of Accused, Onus On Accused To Say Why He Did Not Receive It: Karnataka HC
In a recent Karnataka High Court ruling, the court addressed the maintainability of a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It emphasized that the legal notice for cheque bounce must be served properly to initiate proceedings, highlighting the significance of procedural adherence in such cases. The judgment underscores the criticality of ensuring legal formalities are meticulously followed to validate the claim under Section 138. This decision provides clarity on the procedural aspects essential for the validity of cheque bounce cases in court.