Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Penalty u/s 112(a) and 114AA cannot be Imposed on Customs Broker as Revenue fails to Prove Direct...
Penalty under Sections 112A and 114AA cannot be imposed on a customs broker if revenue fails to prove direct involvement in wrongdoing: CESTAT. This crucial ruling emphasizes the importance of direct evidence in penalizing customs brokers. Sections 112A and 114AA pertain to penalties for fraudulent acts related to customs. The CESTAT (Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) clarified that a customs broker cannot be held liable for misdeeds without clear proof of their direct involvement or knowledge, protecting them from vicarious liability based on unsubstantiated claims.