PhD Thesis Not Containing Commercially Sensitive, Proprietary Information Not Exempt From Disclosure Under RTI Act: Delhi HC

The Karnataka High Court addressed the issue of whether an FIR can be quashed based on the statements of the victim or witnesses. The Court held that such a decision should not be made solely on these statements unless there is a clear case for quashing. The Court emphasized that FIRs should be reviewed based on the evidence and legal grounds, not solely on witness statements. The ruling reinforces the principle that criminal investigations and proceedings must follow proper legal processes, even if the witnesses or victims wish to withdraw their complaints.