Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Labour Laws
06/09/20264 min read
← back
Informative
PMLA | Person Need Not Be Named As Accused In Complaint To Retain Seized Property Under Section 8(3) : Supreme Court
Money Laundering (PMLA)Other Legal Matters
The Supreme Court has ruled that a person need not be named as an accused in a complaint for the continuation of retention of seized property under Section 8 of the PMLA. This decision clarifies the procedural requirements for property retention under the PMLA. The ruling emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory provisions. This judgment provides clarity on money laundering procedures. The ruling underscores the need for legal compliance.
