Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates Limited Scope For Interference U/S 34 & 37 Of Arbitration Act, Upholds Award In Land Development Dispute
The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled on the scope of interference with arbitral awards under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act. The court emphasized that interference is limited to cases where the award is patently illegal or violates public policy. The case involved a challenge to an arbitral award on the grounds of procedural irregularities and incorrect application of law. The court found that the award did not meet the threshold for interference under Section 37 and upheld the arbitral tribunal’s decision. The ruling reinforces the principle of minimal judicial intervention in arbitral awards to uphold the finality and efficiency of arbitration.