Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
S. 27 Evidence Act | Recovery Based On Statement By Accused Before Recording Of S.27 Disclosure Not Admissible : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that recoveries based on statements made by accused individuals before the formal recording required under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act are not admissible in court. The provision permits the use of disclosures leading to recoveries only when recorded lawfully. In this case, the court excluded evidence obtained through non-compliant disclosures, emphasizing that procedural safeguards must be strictly adhered to. This judgment underscores the importance of maintaining evidentiary integrity in criminal investigations to uphold the rights of the accused and ensure fair trials.