S.50 PMLA | Confession Made To ED Not Hit By Evidence Act, Whether Made Voluntarily Or Coercively Would Be Decided At Trial: Madras HC

The Madras High Court ruled that statements recorded under Section 50 of PMLA aren't governed by the Indian Evidence Act, giving enforcement agencies wider latitude in economic offenses cases. Justice G Jayachandran held that PMLA creates a special evidentiary framework where strict evidence rules don't apply during investigation stages. The case involved a challenge to money laundering charges based on statement technicalities. This judgment strengthens ED's investigative powers while raising concerns about due process safeguards. The ruling clarifies that PMLA statements have independent validity regardless of evidentiary act compliance, though their ultimate evidentiary value remains subject to trial court scrutiny. Legal experts note this may lead to more convictions but requires careful judicial oversight to prevent abuse.