Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Sessions Court Cannot Suspend Accused's Sentence Solely To Enable Filing Of Revision Plea: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court held that a sessions court should not mechanically suspend an accused’s sentence merely to enable the filing of a revision petition in the High Court. Suspension of sentence is an extraordinary relief that requires independent and persuasive grounds — it cannot be granted as a procedural convenience to facilitate appellate or revisional remedies. The court underlined that factors such as prima facie merits, likelihood of prejudice, balance of convenience, and the nature and gravity of the offence must be examined before staying or suspending the operation of a conviction and sentence. The judgment warns against preserving liberty on tenuous grounds that may jeopardise the ends of justice and emphasizes judicial responsibility in exercising inherent powers. By insisting on a principled approach, the High Court seeks to prevent indiscriminate suspension orders that could undermine sentencing objectives and public confidence in criminal justice administration.