Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Smuggling Convictions Need Corroborative Evidence Beyond Confessions for Legitimacy: CESTAT Acquits Accused
The CESTAT has acquitted individuals accused of smuggling, emphasizing that convictions must be based on corroborative evidence beyond mere confessions. The tribunal noted that confessions, especially when retracted, require additional supporting evidence to establish guilt. This ruling highlights the importance of thorough investigation and the need for solid evidence in prosecuting smuggling cases. It reinforces the legal principle that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and convictions cannot be solely based on uncorroborated confessions.