Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Special PMLA Court on Money Laundering by Public Servant: Ex-IAS Officer Convicted and Sentenced.
Update / Judgement Date
07 Dec 2025
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Sakshi Bhardwaj — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
2 min read

The Special Court (PMLA), Ahmedabad convicted former IAS officer Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma for the offence of money laundering under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for five years along with a fine of ₹50,000 and ordered confiscation of assets worth ₹1.32 crore. The Court also refused to grant the benefit of concurrent sentences, holding that offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the PMLA are distinct and serious in nature.
• Directorate of Enforcement (ED) initiated investigation based on multiple FIRs registered in Gujarat:
– FIR No. 03/2010 dated 31.03.2010
– FIR No. 09/2010 dated 25.09.2010 (CID Crime, Rajkot Zone)
– FIR No. 06/2014 dated 30.09.2014 (ACB, Bhuj)
• FIRs were registered under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
• While serving as District Collector, Bhuj (Kutch), the accused allegedly entered into a criminal conspiracy and allotted government land at undervalued rates beyond his authority.
• The accused caused financial loss of ₹1,20,30,824 to the Government of Gujarat and obtained undue pecuniary benefits.
• Discharge application filed by the accused was rejected.
• The Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the accused’s appeal and held that money laundering is a continuing offence as long as illicit proceeds are possessed or projected as legitimate.
• The High Court earlier directed that the trial be completed in a time-bound manner.
• Money laundering is a continuing offence and cannot be treated as a one-time act.
• The accused, being a senior public servant (IAS officer), misused his official position.
• Offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the PMLA are separate and distinct statutes with different objectives.
• Given the seriousness and gravity of offences, the benefit of concurrent sentences was rightly denied.
• Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
• Provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act
• Relevant Sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
• Conviction of Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma under Section 3, PMLA.
• Sentence: Rigorous imprisonment for 5 years + fine of ₹50,000.
• In default of payment of fine: 3 months simple imprisonment.
• Confiscation of attached assets worth ₹1.32 crore to the Central Government.
• Prayer for concurrent running of sentences rejected.