Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Suit For Specific Performance Doesn't End With Passing Of Decree; Court Retains Power To Annul Decree Or Extend Time : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled on a suit for specific performance under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act. It considered the enforceability of contracts and the circumstances under which specific performance could be granted. The Court clarified that specific performance is a discretionary remedy and can be denied if the contract is deemed unfair or impractical. The decision highlighted the importance of mutual consent and the clarity of contractual terms in enforcing such claims. It reinforced that courts must balance fairness and legal principles when considering applications for specific performance of agreements.