Supreme Court Declines To Intervene In Challenge Against Haj Policy 2025 Implementation

The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a petition challenging the implementation of the Haj Policy 2025. The petitioners alleged that the policy was discriminatory and lacked transparency. However, the court ruled that the policy fell within the executive's domain, emphasizing the separation of powers. The judges acknowledged the government's prerogative in managing religious pilgrimages while urging fairness in execution. The ruling highlights the judiciary's deference to administrative decisions in religious matters, reaffirming the importance of policy-based governance.