Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Supreme Court on Invocation of Arbitration Clause in Employment Contract.
Update / Judgement Date
06 Nov 2025
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Sakshi Bhardwaj — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
2 min read

Headnote:
The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause in an employment agreement cannot be invoked to settle disputes arising out of the contract of personal service. The Court reaffirmed that employment contracts involving personal obligations do not constitute “commercial disputes” amenable to arbitration under Section 2(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Background:
• The appellant, M/s Alchemist Hospitals Ltd., entered into an employment agreement with the respondent, M/s ICT Health Technology Services India Pvt. Ltd., for healthcare technology management.
• After disputes arose over the termination of the agreement, the appellant invoked the arbitration clause under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
• The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the underlying contract was one of personal service and therefore not arbitrable.
• The appellant approached the Supreme Court challenging this finding.
Court’s Observations:
• The Court reiterated that disputes arising out of employment contracts involving personal service are excluded from arbitration as they pertain to personal rights and duties, not commercial or business transactions.
• It distinguished between “commercial employment” and “contracts of personal service,” clarifying that the latter are non-arbitrable as per established jurisprudence in Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. (2011) 5 SCC 532.
• The arbitration clause in the agreement, though valid, cannot override statutory limitations on arbitrability.
• The Court further held that invocation of arbitration in such cases would defeat the public policy underpinning employment law, where remedies are to be sought before appropriate labor or civil courts.
Legal Provisions Discussed:
• Section 2(1)(c), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Definition of “commercial dispute.”
• Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Appointment of arbitrators.
• Article 136, Constitution of India – Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court.
Citation: 2025 INSC 1289
Case: M/s Alchemist Hospitals Ltd. v. M/s ICT Health Technology Services India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision: 06 November 2025
Civil Appeal No.: 4581 of 2025