Supreme Court Rejects State's Argument That It Has No Liability To Pay Retiral Benefits To Employee Of Aided Institution Whose Dismissal Was Set Aside

The Supreme Court rejected a state’s argument that it had no liability to pay retiral benefits to an employee of an aided institution whose dismissal was set aside. The Court ruled that the employee was entitled to retiral benefits despite the fact that their dismissal had been overturned. The ruling underscores the principle of fairness in employment matters and ensures that employees who are unjustly dismissed are not deprived of their entitlements. This decision highlights the Court’s stance on upholding workers' rights, especially regarding retirement benefits.