[Trademarks Act] Infringement Proceedings Can't Be Quashed Due To 'Irregularity' Of Search & Seizure Without Registrar's Opinion: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court ruled on the interpretation of Section 115 of the Trade Marks Act concerning appeals against orders of the Registrar of Trade Marks. The court clarified that an appeal can only be entertained on substantial questions of law, not on questions of fact alone. It emphasized the limited scope of interference with factual findings of the Registrar. This decision underscores the judicial approach to appeals under the Trade Marks Act, aiming to maintain consistency and avoid undue interference in factual determinations by the Registrar.