Tribunal Reforms Act: Re-Enactment of Struck Down Provisions Shows Administration Inconsistent With Constitutional Spirit

The Supreme Court strongly criticized the Union Government for re-enacting provisions of the Tribunal Reforms Act that had already been struck down earlier. The Court held that such repetition shows “administrative unwillingness” to comply with judicial directions and undermines the rule of law. It emphasized that while Parliament has the power to legislate, re-enacting unconstitutional provisions without curing defects violates basic constitutional principles. The judgment reinforces judicial independence, separation of powers, and the constitutional mandate that tribunals must be structured to ensure fairness and impartiality. The Court reiterated that the independence of adjudicatory bodies cannot be diluted through executive influence or legislative shortcuts. This ruling stands as a strong reaffirmation of constitutional supremacy and sends a clear message against legislative attempts to override judicial scrutiny.