Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
UAPA | Mere Allegations Of Terrorist Gang Association Without 'Specific Evidence' Insufficient To Deny Bail: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to a member of a terrorist gang charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the continued detention of the accused. The accused had been in custody for an extended period without trial, raising concerns about the violation of his right to a speedy trial. The court emphasized that while the UAPA is a stringent law aimed at combating terrorism, it should not be used to infringe on the fundamental rights of individuals. The court directed the authorities to expedite the trial and ensure that the accused’s rights are protected. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s role in balancing national security concerns with the protection of individual rights and highlights the importance of due process and fair trial in cases involving serious charges under anti-terrorism laws.