Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Why Create Social Disharmony? : Allahabad HC Questions Mohd Zubair For Posting On 'X' About Yati Narsinghanand Speech Instead Of Filing FIR
The Karnataka High Court dealt with a defamation case in which an assistant commissioner was accused of shouting at a senior advocate. The Court examined the facts and held that the actions of the assistant commissioner did not constitute defamation, as there was no intention to harm the reputation of the advocate. The judgment underscored the importance of proving malice or defamatory intent in defamation cases. The ruling clarifies that mere verbal altercations, without the requisite malicious intent, do not meet the criteria for defamation under civil law.