Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Woman's Character & Morals Not Related To Number Of Sexual Partners, Her 'No' Means 'No': Bombay HC Upholds Gang Rape Conviction
The Bombay High Court made significant observations about consent in sexual assault cases, stating that a woman's character or sexual history is irrelevant to determining whether she consented to a specific sexual act. The court emphasized that "no means no" regardless of the victim's background or previous relationships. This judgment reinforces the evolving jurisprudence on sexual consent and victim rights in India. The court strongly deprecated the tendency to scrutinize the victim's character rather than focus on the alleged offender's conduct. The ruling will influence how trial courts examine consent defenses in sexual offense cases and prevent inappropriate lines of questioning about the victim's sexual history during trials.