NCLT Allahabad Holds Inter-Corporate Deposits Repayable Under RBI Act, Orders NBFC to Refund ₹18.5 Crore
Court / Authority
NCLT & NCLAT
Update / Judgement Date
19 Jun 2026
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Manas Yadav — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
2 min read
View Count
Background
The National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench (Prayagraj) has held that inter-corporate deposits (ICDs) fall within the definition of “deposit” under Section 45I(bb) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, and are therefore repayable under Section 45QA, even if they are not classified as “public deposits”.
The petition was filed by Madhusudan Motors Private Limited, an authorised Maruti Suzuki dealer, against Shivam Traders and Hire Purchase Private Limited, a non-deposit-accepting NBFC. The parties are family-controlled entities, with disputes also pending between rival family factions before the NCLT and civil courts.
The Petitioner claimed it had advanced ₹18.54 crore to the Respondent as deposits under an oral arrangement carrying 10% interest, repayable at the end of the financial year. Despite repeated demand notices and complaints to the RBI, the Respondent failed to repay the amount, prompting the invocation of Section 45QA.
The NBFC argued that the funds were not deposits but a long-term inter-corporate loan governed by an agreement dated April 1, 2019, with a nine-year tenure ending in March 2028. It further contended that ICDs are excluded from “public deposits” under RBI Master Directions and therefore fall outside Section 45QA.
Order
Rejecting the defence, the Tribunal held that:
● The definition of “deposit” under Section 45I(bb) is broad and inclusive, covering loans and ICDs unless expressly excluded.
● Exclusion of ICDs from “public deposits” under RBI Master Directions is only for regulatory purposes and does not override the RBI Act.
● The alleged agreement was unenforceable, having been executed by a common director without any Board or Section 186 Companies Act approval.
The NCLT directed repayment of the deposit amount, with the exact sum to be reconciled between the parties. The decision reinforces that NBFCs cannot avoid repayment obligations by recharacterising deposits as inter-corporate loans
Full Judgement / Attachment
Full Judgement
Frequently asked questions about NCLT & NCLAT
- What are the NCLT and NCLAT?
- The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) were constituted on 1 June 2016 under the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLT sits in benches across India, and the NCLAT hears appeals from it, with its principal bench in New Delhi and a bench in Chennai.
- What cases does the NCLT hear?
- The NCLT is the Adjudicating Authority for corporate insolvency under the IBC. It also hears company law matters, including oppression and mismanagement petitions, schemes of merger and demerger, reduction of capital, and class action suits.
- What is the time limit to appeal an NCLT order to the NCLAT?
- Under the Companies Act, the appeal is due within 45 days, extendable by up to 45 days. Under the IBC, it is due within 30 days, extendable by up to 15 days. These outer limits are strictly applied.
- How can I check NCLT case status or orders?
- Case status, cause lists and orders are available on the NCLT website (nclt.gov.in) and the NCLAT website (nclat.nic.in), searchable by case number, party name or bench.
- How can White Collar Professional help with a NCLT or NCLAT matter?
- Post your requirement on White Collar Professional to receive proposals from verified Company Secretaries, Insolvency Professionals and Advocates, compare them, and pay securely through the platform. This page also tracks the latest NCLT or NCLAT NCLT and NCLAT judgements as they are reported.
