NCLT Allahabad: NBFC Must Repay Shareholder Deposits Despite Absence of Written Agreement; Limitation Saved by Acknowledgment in Accounts
Court / Authority
NCLT & NCLAT
Update / Judgement Date
18 Jun 2026
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Manas Yadav — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
2 min read
View Count
Background
The National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench (Prayagraj) has held that a non-banking financial company (NBFC) cannot evade its statutory obligation to repay deposits merely because no formal written agreement exists, particularly where the liability is consistently acknowledged in audited financial statements.The Petitioner, a shareholder of the Respondent NBFC, claimed that it had advanced ₹1.10 crore under an oral arrangement carrying 9% annual interest, repayable at the end of the financial year. Despite repeated demand notices and a complaint to the RBI, the Respondent failed to repay the amount. The NBFC disputed the claim, contending that the transaction was a long-term loan repayable only after nine years, that no default had occurred, and that the petition was barred by limitation.
Findings and Order
Rejecting the Respondent’s objections, the Tribunal held that:
● Limitation was not a bar, as the liability was continuously acknowledged in the Respondent’s audited balance sheets, constituting acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the COVID-19 limitation extension applied.
● Under Section 45I(bb) of the RBI Act, any receipt of money by an NBFC by way of loan or otherwise constitutes a “deposit”, unless expressly excluded.
● A written agreement is not mandatory for invoking Section 45QA; oral arrangements are legally enforceable, particularly when the receipt of funds is admitted.
● Family disputes and internal understandings cannot override an NBFC’s statutory duty to repay deposits.
The NCLT directed the Respondent NBFC to repay the deposit amount, with the final sum to be reconciled between the parties. The decision reinforces that NBFCs remain bound by the RBI Act to honour repayment obligations, regardless of documentation gaps or shareholder relationships.
Full Judgement / Attachment
Full Judgement
Frequently asked questions about NCLT & NCLAT
- What are the NCLT and NCLAT?
- The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) were constituted on 1 June 2016 under the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLT sits in benches across India, and the NCLAT hears appeals from it, with its principal bench in New Delhi and a bench in Chennai.
- What cases does the NCLT hear?
- The NCLT is the Adjudicating Authority for corporate insolvency under the IBC. It also hears company law matters, including oppression and mismanagement petitions, schemes of merger and demerger, reduction of capital, and class action suits.
- What is the time limit to appeal an NCLT order to the NCLAT?
- Under the Companies Act, the appeal is due within 45 days, extendable by up to 45 days. Under the IBC, it is due within 30 days, extendable by up to 15 days. These outer limits are strictly applied.
- How can I check NCLT case status or orders?
- Case status, cause lists and orders are available on the NCLT website (nclt.gov.in) and the NCLAT website (nclat.nic.in), searchable by case number, party name or bench.
- How can White Collar Professional help with a NCLT or NCLAT matter?
- Post your requirement on White Collar Professional to receive proposals from verified Company Secretaries, Insolvency Professionals and Advocates, compare them, and pay securely through the platform. This page also tracks the latest NCLT or NCLAT NCLT and NCLAT judgements as they are reported.
