Arbitrator's Findings as per Evidence, Not Perverse, no need to interfere; Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that the findings of an arbitrator were consistent with the evidence presented, and their conclusions were reasonable, not perverse. The case involved an examination of whether the arbitrator's decisions were supported by the evidence and whether they had been cross-examined properly. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings, stating that they were based on a fair assessment of the evidence and did not involve any irrational or unjustified conclusions. This decision reinforces the principle that arbitrators' findings should be respected as long as they are reasonably supported by the evidence and follow due process in their reasoning.