Calcutta High Court refuses to entertain PIL to enforce advocate protection law, says it's up to State

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that the protection of advocates under law is primarily a matter for state governments to handle. The court emphasized that the existing legal provisions intended to safeguard lawyers do not mandate uniform protection across all states. Instead, each state has the discretion to implement measures tailored to its specific needs and challenges. The decision highlights the fragmented approach to legal protections for advocates, which can result in varied levels of security depending on regional legislative and administrative priorities. This ruling reflects a broader debate about the adequacy of existing laws in addressing the safety concerns of legal professionals and the need for a more cohesive national framework for their protection.