Can't Convict One Accused & Acquit Another When Similar Evidence Was Pitted Against Them : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that it is impermissible to convict one accused while acquitting another when similar evidence is presented against both. This decision highlights the principle of consistency in judicial decisions, ensuring that similar cases are treated alike to maintain fairness and justice. The Court emphasized that discrepancies in the treatment of co-accused based on identical evidence undermine the credibility of the judicial process. This ruling reinforces the need for uniform standards in evaluating evidence and delivering judgments, thereby upholding the integrity of the legal system.