Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Delhi High Court on Emergency Parole for Performing Last Rites of Father.
Update / Judgement Date
07 Dec 2025
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Sakshi Bhardwaj — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
2 min read

The Delhi High Court granted emergency parole for one week to a life convict to enable him to perform the last rites (Tehrvi) of his deceased father, holding that denial of parole in such circumstances would infringe the prisoner’s right to dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
• The petitioner sought emergency parole in FIR No. 507/2008 registered at PS Anand Vihar under Sections 302/307/324/34 IPC for performing the Tehrvi of his deceased father and maintaining family ties.
• The petitioner was convicted under Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment by judgment dated 30.03.2012 and order on sentence dated 03.04.2012.
• The petitioner had undergone more than 13 years of custody and his jail conduct was reported as “satisfactory”.
• The father of the petitioner expired on 27.11.2025 and the Tehrvi ceremony was scheduled for 09.12.2025, which was verified by the status report.
• Rule 1208 and Rule 1212 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 permit grant of parole for maintaining family and social ties and on humanitarian grounds.
• The Supreme Court in Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan (2017) 15 SCC 55 recognised performing last rites of a parent as a valid ground for parole.
• The Court relied upon its earlier decision in Ajmer Singh @ Pinka v. State of NCT of Delhi (W.P.(Crl.) 3146/2025), holding that performing last rites of a parent is an essential moral and religious duty protected under Article 21.
• Sections 302/307/324/34, Indian Penal Code, 1860
• Rules 1208 & 1212, Delhi Prison Rules, 2018
• Article 21, Constitution of India
• The petitioner was granted emergency parole for one week.
• Release was made subject to conditions including furnishing of personal bond and surety, address verification, provision of mobile number, and timely surrender after expiry of parole.
• The petition was allowed in the above terms.
Case: Sandeep Kumar @ Manoj v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi
Coram: Justice Amit Mahajan
Date of Decision: 08 December 2025
Writ Petition (Crl.) No.: 4048 of 2025