District Commission Must Refer Points Of Difference To Third Member If Two Presiding Members Don't Agree: Uttarakhand State

In a recent ruling by the Uttarakhand State Commission, the procedure for appointing a third member to a District Commission was clarified. The State Commission emphasized that the District Commission must refer cases to the State Commission for deciding on the appointment of a third member when there is a difference of opinion among the two members. This procedure is outlined under Section 14 of the Consumer Protection Act. The ruling ensures that the appointment process adheres to legal standards and maintains fairness in the resolution of consumer disputes.