Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Gujarat High Court Pulls Up Officer For "Vehemence", Filing "Misguided Response" To Oppose PIL Seeking Improvement Of State Highway
The Gujarat High Court criticized a government officer's misguided response to a PIL concerning potholes in roads, stressing that PILs should not be treated as adversarial litigation. The court emphasized that the primary goal of PILs is to address public grievances and improve governance, rather than engage in legal battles. This ruling highlights the importance of constructive engagement between government officials and the judiciary in resolving public issues.