Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Himachal Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: August 2025 — Key Judgments and Legal Developments
This digest compiles important judgments of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in August 2025. Significant rulings include: detention under NDPS cannot rest on assumption that a blood sample may yield heroin traces. The Financial Commissioner’s overruling of a District Collector’s decision was struck down for exceeding jurisdiction. Overloading of a passenger vehicle not seen as a fundamental breach unless causally linked to the accident. A government servant was entitled to maternity leave even if third child was born after her joining the service. Board must issue merit certificate after revaluation; school board held accountable. Safety status of a 140-year-old underground water tank in Shimla Ridge was ordered. The Court refused protection to accused police personnel simply because of their status. The Municipal Council can’t withhold statutory sewerage connections due to objections from landowners. Section 163-A of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act was declared unconstitutional, as it regularised all illegal encroachments unfairly. Overpaid salaries cannot be recovered after five years in absence of misrepresentation. A juvenile (16-yr-old) was held to be tried as adult in a rape case after medical board assessment. Document omission in counsel’s brief not a ground to invoke Order 7 Rule 14 CPC. Faculty members held criminally negligent in the Beas River tragedy; protection directed for a young interfaith married couple; government employees acquiring benchmark disability during service get extended retirement even if not appointed under PwD quota; in employment matters, past eligibility without convened promotion committee doesn’t entitle promotion after retirement; once study leave is sanctioned under old leave rules, salary cannot be reduced after a subsequent amendment; proof of misconduct required for disciplinary punishment affecting service benefits; state must be impartial; legal heirs must be made party when judgment debtor dies; pay parity with another state can't be claimed merely because same pay commission followed; merely “Pakistan Zindabad” post without other factors does not amount to sedition; regularisation of Class IV employee after 20 years awarded with costs; liability under Forest Act for encroachment requires notification of reserved forest; Aadhar or mere assertion of age doesn’t help accused under POCSO; grounds of arrest must be given in NDPS commercial quantity cases