Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Karnataka High Court Denies Prajwal Revanna's Request to Transfer MP/MLA Court Cases
The Karnataka High Court dismissed Prajwal Revanna’s request to transfer cases against him from the Special MP/MLA Court, holding that there was no evidence of bias or prejudice by the presiding officer. Revanna had sought transfer alleging partiality, but the court found these claims unsubstantiated and noted that judicial proceedings must proceed based on merit, not speculative allegations. The ruling underscores the principle that requests for transfer should be supported by concrete evidence of prejudice rather than perceived inconvenience. It reinforces public confidence in the impartiality of special courts designated to handle cases against elected representatives. The court emphasized that the integrity and independence of judicial officers are vital to ensuring fair trial rights while preventing misuse of procedural applications to delay proceedings. The decision reiterates that judicial scrutiny is focused on fairness and adherence to due process.