Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Legal Profession Not Commerical Activity, Lawyers Cannot Pressurise Court To Pass Favourable Orders To Recover Fees From Client: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled on the limited scope of judicial review in contractual matters. The court emphasized that it should not interfere in contractual disputes unless there is a clear violation of statutory provisions or public policy. This decision delineates the boundaries of judicial intervention in private contracts, advocating for minimal interference and respect for contractual autonomy. The judgment reinforces the principle that courts should only intervene when there is a substantial legal ground to do so.