Magistrates Can Direct Witnesses To Give Voice Samples, Not Just Accused: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that Magistrates possess the authority to direct not only accused persons but also witnesses to provide voice samples during investigations. The Court clarified that such a direction does not violate Article 20(3) of the Constitution, as it does not amount to self-incrimination. This decision enhances investigative efficiency, especially in cases involving electronic evidence and digital communication. The judgment aligns with the evolving technological landscape of criminal trials, acknowledging that voice samples can play a crucial evidentiary role in authenticating recordings. The ruling also harmonizes the investigative powers of law enforcement with constitutional safeguards, ensuring that evidence-gathering mechanisms remain robust yet legally sound.