NGT rejects transfer plea flagging appointment of judge's son as amicus curiae

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) recently rejected a plea to transfer a case that raised concerns about a conflict of interest involving the appointment of a judge’s son as an amicus curiae. The petitioner alleged that the judge’s connection to the appointed amicus could compromise the case's impartiality. However, the NGT dismissed the claims, stating that mere familial ties do not automatically suggest bias, especially when there is no substantive evidence proving misconduct or undue influence. The decision emphasized the importance of addressing conflict-of-interest allegations only when credible and actionable proof is available. The case highlights broader issues of fairness and transparency in legal appointments, specifically in India's environmental adjudications, where the NGT plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance between developmental activities and environmental protection.