Non-Response Can't Be Presumed As Consent For Appointment Of Arbitrator: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that silence or non-response from a party cannot be assumed as consent for the appointment of an arbitrator. The court emphasized that explicit consent is necessary for arbitration proceedings to be valid. The ruling clarifies that an arbitrator cannot be appointed unilaterally based on the absence of objection from the other party, thereby ensuring that the process remains fair and consensual. This decision reinforces the importance of clear communication and agreement in arbitration matters.